Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last


Hi,

I think LibO is alot better in compatibility than OO.org as alot of work was put into LibO during the OO.org Apache switch, which was the reason i didnt bother doing my testing on it. Using office.com might return problems not available in the offline editions, and i'm not sure how extensive compatibility is. Yes the QA-ML seems to be the right place for me and i have registered.

Jay Philips

On 04/21/2014 10:05 AM, Florian Reisinger wrote:
Hi,

Hmmm I guess that OO.org and LibO are close to equivalent, maybe LibO just a tiny bit better.... I 
do not know anything else to be honest (i have Office 2010 on Win 7). Anyway, if there are problems 
with basic things, maybe you could try this https://office.com/start/default.aspx you can upload 
the files to OneDrive, isolate (delete) the issues, download the file and open it in LibreOffice 
and save it....

It seems you might be right @ QA-ML of LibO: 
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
(I know, it is not ghe liberation project, it's LibreOffice....)

Liebe Grüße, / Yours,
Florian Reisinger

Am 20.04.2014 um 22:43 schrieb Jay Philips <philipz85@hotmail.com>:

Hi Florian,

Well the intent of my testing is to determine which linux office suite can best handle docx 
compatibility, so that i can suggest that suite to users who are making the shift from windows and 
bringing their office 2007+ documents with them, in addition to submitting bugs to LibreOffice's 
bug tracker as its the FOSS office suite. Regarding 'minimal' test cases, i dont regularly create 
documents in microsoft office and the last version of it that i have is office 2000 or xp, so its 
not possible for me to create original .docx files in it to show that particular error, but if that 
is what is needed, i can have a friend who uses office 2010 or 2013 edit the file to isolate the 
issue. If i can assist the document liberation project, than i'm more than willing to do so if its 
in my capacity.

Jay Philips

On 04/20/2014 06:47 PM, Florian Reisinger wrote:
Hi Jay,

I had no time to watch the talk myself, but what I can say is: In the LibreOffice-project we lack time (like people workdays). I 
would appreciate someone deeper involved in the documentliberation project than me to present his/her opinion.... As far as I 
understood, there is no seperate bugtracker ATM (or even "products", but that may change). Having a shared bugzilla 
with LibreOffice would make a lot of sense (the filters as single products, which in fact they are). So yes, it is important to 
have the documents and the diffs (opening in LibO, no edit saved in LibO. [From the unzipped file, as docx, odt are zipped 
AFAIK]). Okay up until here I was neutral, and now something I hope does not sound impolite or even rude: If a bug is not in the 
database, it is not a bug [Like: "we cannot do anything against it"]. I also do fear, that your documents are not 
"minimal" test cases. Your iniative (and please do not take the following as rude) does not make a lot of sense yet. Do 
not understand me wrong, you present the status quo, but that won't change as much as it could. Furthermore it would be important 
to have a dev which actually does the change (e.g. I am working at this project [LibreOffice] in my spare time,as well as many 
developers do. Of course some get paid to fix something, but that is professional support). What i want to say here: It's not 
about looking at the docs, they have to be a small test document showing the error. If it is in the database a dev is needed, 
which wants to fix this problem. All in all this is a long, time consuming task. What I know of the QA department in the projects 
we lack man-hours, so none of us can take care of the documentliberation stuff as well [although we have the same goals and the 
same foundation AND the same bugs]. Of course everyone would be willing to assist you at the beginning, but in my opinion we can 
not be that end-user oriented just now

So thank you for reading that paragraph. Some small things: At the moment this mailinglist is a 
very low frequented one, so please do not unsubscribe. Your work IS appreciated, but it would be 
good if you could invest some hours a week/month. What I know is, that this is the only 
documentliberation-mailinglist yet, so you should be right here....

Again thanks for reading, looking forward to hearing your answer :)

Florian
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscribe@documentliberation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentliberation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscribe@documentliberation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentliberation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.